simonshen patreon

【突發時空🇺🇸🇹🇼🇦🇫】塔利班效應：拜登忽然表示「美台聯盟等同北約」，認真定講笑？

🕑 Added 2021-08-20 03:06:47 +0000 UTC

Comments

Chris Chan

同感。如果唔講明，隨時中國借 d 意打金門都唔奇

Simon Shen

I think he means, "there's a fundamental difference between (Taiwan, South Korea, NATO and the like) and Afghanistan"

Alvin

仲有一個可能，係拜登語無論次，前言不對後語，唔知自己講緊乜，亦唔記得自己講咗乜。睇睇整個對答… STEPHANOPOULOS: You talked about our adversaries, China and Russia. You already see China telling Taiwan, "See? You can't count on the Americans." (LAUGH) BIDEN: Sh-- why wouldn't China say that? Look, George, the idea that w-- there's a fundamental difference between-- between Taiwan, South Korea, NATO. We are in a situation where they are in-- entities we've made agreements with based on not a civil war they're having on that island or in South Korea, but on an agreement where they have a unity government that, in fact, is trying to keep bad guys from doin' bad things to them. We have made-- kept every commitment. We made a sacred commitment to Article Five that if in fact anyone were to invade or take action against our NATO allies, we would respond. Same with Japan, same with South Korea, same with-- Taiwan. It's not even comparable to talk about that. 短短兩段，已經前後矛盾，前言不對後語，一時又話北約同南韓台灣唔同，但又冇講有乜唔同，之後講北約article 5，又話日本南韓台灣一樣，但又唔交代邊方面一樣，綜合兩段，你會發覺唔知佢想講乜，所以無謂太緊張，佢多數已經唔記得講過呢兩段。

Wilson Chu

拜登呢啲老手唔會隨口講，全因為呢幾日已經有媒體直接提到南韓、日本、北約呢啲有駐軍既國家，直指有朝一日比人打，美國佬會唔會又走左去？其中一篇： https://www.wsj.com/articles/americas-failures-in-afghanistan-were-bipartisan-and-long-running-11629118830