simonshen patreon

【突發評論 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇪🇺🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇹🇫🇮】美烏歐九方峰會：二戰後最動人的一天・特朗普彰顯大國領袖風範

🕑 Added 2025-08-19 06:05:32 +0000 UTC

Comments

pp lam

俄羅斯基本上毫無受到懲罰下佔領到烏克蘭既土地，這是二戰後領袖應有既風範嗎？只可以話呢個係可悲的世界

Pierre

Totally agger KTH兄所言，侵嘅straight係有連貫性，唔係左媒侵黑所言的「飄忽不定」。侵永遠有兩手（甚至多手）準備，唔會永遠得一招，亦唔會只顧形象，而放唔低身段。靈活運用不同甜頭、pressure甚至暗示手上有對家「黑料」。好多時世人誤會侵用關稅去搵錢or係最終目標，其實關稅只係「手段」，等於動用B-2轟炸機，大眾覺得係震懾伊朗及摧毀核電廠，普通人覺得伊朗縮埋一邊，呢個章節已經完，查實係一套組合拳，侵令哈霉內褲龜縮，但侵好清楚㩒得一時，㩒唔到一世，所以中東地區就交由內塔尼亞胡去睇場。同一時間高加索區，就交俾阿塞拜疆（接壤伊朗）鎮住，順手掃走親俄勢力，之後會打通中亞地區，令一帶一露計劃正式收皮。單單呢一個舉動，就顯示出侵嘅大戰略，呢啲就真係下緊一大盤棋。之前有KOL話侵做事係即興，無結果出現就撒手不管。其實係誤解侵，正正係侵明白暫時時機未到，攤攤先、諗吓先，然後殺個回馬槍，呢啲就係靈活處理。如果侵無耐性無鬥志，佢就唔會選第二次啦，你估再選唔會出事咩？！真係會死的（起碼已經有殺手了）

George

A high-profile meeting between Putin and Zelensky, if it materializes, would only mark a symbolic shift for Putin who has previously resisted direct talks, and the start of arduous negotiations with no assured outcome. However, without significant changes on the battlefield, it’s unlikely that the West could push back on Putin’s unjust demands. A lasting peace is deemed fragile and seems unlikely, especially when Trump is no longer in the White House. High-profile summits, like the 2018 Trump-Kim meeting, generated media attention but rarely yielded lasting results. The next steps will be far more complicated as negotiations unfold with the ebb and flow of the head-to-head confrontation. The path to peace in the Russia-Ukraine war, now in its third year, faces formidable obstacles. Key challenges include whether to freeze or cede territory along front lines in contested regions like Donetsk, Luhansk, and Kherson, where Russian forces have made incremental gains amid heavy fighting. Other issues involve defining, in terms acceptable to Kyiv, the role of European nations—whether as mediators or contributors to a long-term security force for Kyiv—and securing credible guarantees from the US and Europe that satisfy Zelensky while being acceptable to a cunning Putin. Distrust remains high given Russia’s history of violating agreements, while Zelensky insists on robust Western security commitments and Russia’s withdrawal from occupied territories. Any agreement must also address frozen Russian assets in Europe, economic reparations, long-term rotational NATO deployment in Ukraine alongside weapons supply—issues where consensus remains elusive. NATO’s Article 5 is not a guaranteed security commitment or an automatic trigger for allied military action. It states only that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all, with each nation deciding its response—individually or collectively—as it sees fit. Hence, it’s more important to consider how much US long-term interests Trump could deeply connect with Ukraine’s security. If history is any guide, the devil is always in the details.

KTH

其實 MAGA 都唔係全部都孤立主義既，佢地亦唔係 MAGA 主流，MAGA 反對既係毫無建樹既軍援無底洞，咁樣係一定會拖垮美國國力。而家對烏援助由無償援助180度變成賣武器俾烏克蘭，不論係歐洲代烏克蘭出錢，定係烏克蘭自己俾，定係用礦產協議代付，美國都可以從中取利，係資本主義既 Mutually Beneficial 最理想情況。加上之前既礦產協議，美國有利益喺烏克蘭，侵 “忽然” 改口話唔排除駐軍烏克蘭，就變得唔係亂噏廿四。其實侵既對烏政策一路都無變，真正去了解侵政策既人會睇到一致性，唔會俾左媒情緒勒索式既偏頗報導搞到頭暈轉向又話 TACO 又話改黎改去。奉勸各位侵黑，唔好再俾過氣媒體限制你地既眼界，佢餵咩俾你地你地就食落肚，食得太多假嘢落肚只會做成腦閉塞同情緒病。

KTH

但我有樣嘢唔明，點解侵會話可以先有和平協議但唔需要先停火？此前提下，應該會促使俄烏雙方全力出擊，務求喺和平協議簽成之前搶盡量多既土地，爭取最大談判條件？

David

真正嘅大贏家會唔會係特朗普🤔

Gary Lee

一班獅子肚餓咬人，人類冇晒辦法。一日，一個馴獸師走出黎，話，你班友唔 L 識啫，等我黎。跟住馴獸師就搵班獅子出黎，同班獅子斟掂數，叫班獅子唔好亂咬人，佢會安排人俾佢咬。吖，好多獅子又 OK 喎，馴獸師掂，除左一隻最大嘅獅子話佢咬極都唔夠，仲肚餓，仲亂咬人。馴獸師初頭都搞唔掂，最後就諗到個辦法，拎起條鞭(註：唔係鎗)，同大獅子講，你再亂咬人我打你架啦。大獅子見呢次勢色唔對，終於肯同馴獸師斟掂，馴獸師餵個大 d 嘅人俾佢咬。故事完結，大團圓結局，人類跟獅子歡天喜地，贊揚馴獸師，順便頒埋個諾貝爾馴獸師獎俾佢。至於之前俾獅子咬死O既, WFC凸。